Block3 FMEA help and guide

Build a Process FMEA one part at a time: generate the failure modes and causes for each process, rate the risk, and export a clean Excel workbook.

Block3 FMEA is launching soon. This guide covers how it works so you're ready on day one.
Processes come first. An FMEA in Block3 FMEA is assembled from processes, not written from scratch each time. So a process has to exist in your library before a document can use it — that one rule is what makes editing an operation once update every FMEA that uses it.

Getting started

  1. Create your account at block3.dropfeed.io. You start on the Free plan — no credit card required.
  2. Build a process. Go to Process library → New process and name the operation (e.g. "CNC Drilling") and what it does. Click Draft requirements & failure modes and Block3 FMEA writes its requirements, potential failure modes, effects, causes and current controls — or add a requirement and write it yourself. Nothing is generated you can't edit.
  3. Rate the risk. Fill in Severity, Occurrence and Detection (1–10). SEV×OCC, RPN and Action Priority calculate as you type. Rate on the FMEA, where the numbers belong to that part. A rating set in the library comes across as the starting point.
  4. Repeat for every operation the part uses. Each one is analyzed once and lives in the library from then on.
  5. Assemble the FMEA. Click New FMEA, enter the Part number, Revision, Part description and Standard, then tick the processes this part actually uses. The document is built from them.
  6. Set the line numbers. On the document, give each step its Line # so the form prints in your process order — Op 105 before Op 120, whichever you added first. If an operation runs twice, add the process twice and give each placement its own number and title.
  7. Answer the action items. Any cause your ratings pushed to High Action Priority, or past your RPN threshold, appears under Action items with a suggested Recommended Action. Accept it, edit it, put it off, or delete it.
  8. Export. A clean PDF with no watermark on any plan, including Free. The editable Excel .xlsx with merged cells needs a paid plan or a single-document unlock.

Why processes come first

Most FMEA tools make you re-describe the same operation on every part that uses it. Ten parts through the same drill means ten copies of the same analysis, and when a control changes you have ten documents to remember. Block3 FMEA inverts that: the process library holds the analysis, and an FMEA is the list of processes a part uses. Fix a control once and every document that uses that process is correct.

Process steps are named by operation with no made-up operation numbers, so you number and align them to your own process flow and control plan. Set the Line # on each step inside an FMEA and the steps sort by it everywhere, on screen and in both exports, so Op 105 prints before Op 120 no matter which you added first. Whole numbers only, and numbering by tens leaves room to insert an operation later. Steps you leave unnumbered keep the order you added them in and follow the numbered ones.

What you change where

The analysis is read-only on an FMEA. Requirements, failure modes, effects, causes and controls come from the library and are edited there.

What belongs to the part, you set on the document: the Line #, the title the step carries on this form, its Severity, Occurrence and Detection, and which processes are in it. You can also remove a step.

The split is deliberate. A process is shared by every FMEA that uses it, so editing the analysis on a document would either quietly diverge from the library, which is the drift the library exists to stop, or push a change into every other document from a screen that gives no hint that is what it is doing. Ratings are the other way round: the same operation carries different risk on a new part than on a mature one, so they belong to the part.

Using the same process more than once

A routing often runs an operation at more than one stage. You can add the same library process to an FMEA as many times as you need: tick it in the picker again and it comes in as a second step.

Each placement is its own step on the form. It gets its own Line #, its own ratings, and its own title on this FMEA so the two are tellable apart in the export. The title is blank by default, which means the library name is used. Both placements stay tied to the one analysis in your library, so a fix made there still reaches both.

The library is the master copy

When you edit a process in the library and it saves, that change is pushed into every FMEA already using it. You do not remove the process and add it back, and you do not open those documents; they are updated where they sit, and the editor tells you how many changed. Treat the library as your controlled master: a correction there is a correction everywhere, including on documents you finished months ago.

What stays with the document rather than the process, because it belongs to the part and not to the operation: the recommended action you committed to on a line, the line number and title that operation has on this part, and the S, O and D ratings you set. A library update keeps your ratings wherever the row they belong to is still there. Where a requirement, failure mode or cause has been rewritten, that row comes back unrated rather than carrying a score that was assigned to something else. Everything else (requirements, failure modes, effects, causes and controls) comes from the library.

The process editor saves on its own as you work, so nothing is lost to a closed laptop or a dropped connection. It also means there is no moment where an edit is finished but not yet shared. If a process is used across parts that are already released, review it before you change it: the correction reaches all of them.

Organizing parts: families and sub-assemblies

Two different relationships, and they do different jobs.

About the ratings (S, O, D)

Ratings belong to the FMEA. The same operation does not carry the same risk everywhere: a new part and a mature one differ on Occurrence, and an inspection early in the routing differs from the same inspection late in it. So Severity, Occurrence and Detection are set on the document, and each placement of a process carries its own.

You can still rate a process in the library, and those numbers come across as the starting point when it is added to an FMEA. Once you change them on a document they are yours: a later library update keeps them, as long as the row they belong to is still there.

Block3 FMEA deliberately leaves Severity, Occurrence, and Detection blank: those ratings depend on your team's scales and real data, and shouldn't be guessed by AI. Once you fill them in, the tool computes them for you:

When an action is required

A row is flagged as owing a Recommended Action when either of two things is true. The flag appears in the editor and prints in both exports as “Action required” with the reason, so an empty Recommended Action cell always means answered rather than overlooked.

Flagged causes are collected under Action items, with a suggested action written for each one. That page is the only place an action is written or changed — there is no Recommended Action box in the editor, because an action is a decision about risk and a text field in the middle of a rating screen invites it to be answered in passing, or skipped and never returned to. Accept an action and it is written into the document; put it off; or delete it if the cause genuinely needs none. A banner follows you around the app while any are unanswered.

Lower a score later and the action stops printing on your exports without being deleted: the item moves to No longer flagged and comes back exactly as it was, wording included, if the ratings go back up. Only you can delete one for good.

Why 150 rather than 100: Action Priority High already flags a large share of rows on its own. A threshold of 100 roughly doubles what gets flagged, and most of what it adds is already rated AP Medium — the same information twice, which trains people to ignore flags. 150 still catches the case Action Priority is blind to, a low-severity failure that happens often and is hard to detect, without burying it.

The two triggers answer different questions and neither replaces the other. Action Priority asks must this be acted on, weighted so severity dominates. The RPN threshold asks is this noisy. A safety failure caught reliably can be AP High at an RPN in the thirties; a cosmetic defect that happens constantly can pass RPN 100 and still be AP Low.

What the AP column means

Action Priority ranks each cause using all three ratings together, rather than by multiplying them. Multiplying ranks badly. A rare, well-detected safety failure scores 9×2×2 = 36. A frequent cosmetic one scores 4×3×3 = 36. Identical RPN, nothing like the same risk — and a team working top-down through an RPN column would give them equal attention.

AP weights Severity first, then Occurrence, then Detection. A high-severity item therefore stays high priority even when you detect it well, because detecting a hazard reliably is not the same as removing it.

AP stays blank until Severity, Occurrence and Detection are all entered, and recalculates the moment any of them changes. RPN is still exported alongside it, because plenty of customer requirements continue to ask for it.

Each rating attaches to a different part of the row, which is why the exported table merges the way it does: Severity comes from the effect, so it spans the whole failure mode. Occurrence and Detection belong to the individual cause and its controls, so they sit on the cause row — and so does the AP computed from them. Two causes of the same failure mode can, and often should, end up with different priorities.

Requirements are kept generic on purpose: Block3 FMEA never invents specific dimensions, tolerances, or part numbers. Unknown values appear as clear [BRACKETS] for you to confirm against your drawing.

Choosing your standard

Pick the quality standard you work to: ISO 9001, AS9100, IATF 16949, and more, or choose Other and type any customer-specific standard. Each built-in standard carries its own analysis focus, so the draft reaches for what that standard expects: foreign object damage, lot traceability and special-process control under AS9100; special characteristics, control plan alignment and error-proofing under IATF 16949; operator exposure and guarding under ISO 45001. A standard you type yourself is used by name only.

Medical device work is not offered as a built-in standard. A device FMEA has to stay consistent with the risk management file it belongs to, and a draft that looks finished but does not trace into that file helps nobody. You can still type any standard into Other, where it is used by name only.

Plans & usage

Only one thing is metered by the month for cost reasons: AI drafts. Writing requirements by hand is never limited, and assembling an FMEA from processes you already have costs no draft at all. Everything a Free account produces is usable — there is no watermark and nothing is crippled; the paid line is the editable spreadsheet and the volume.

Frequently asked questions

Why can’t I edit the analysis inside an FMEA?

Because it is not the document’s to edit. One process, one analysis, shared by every part that uses it — so it is edited in the process library and every document follows. On an FMEA you set the line numbers and choose which processes it contains.

Does the AI assign S/O/D ratings?

No. It produces the qualitative analysis: failure modes, effects, causes, controls, and recommended actions, and leaves the numeric ratings for your team to set. RPN and Action Priority then calculate automatically.

What counts against my monthly limits?

Two things, separately. Each AI draft in the process library counts one — that is the only action that costs us anything to run. Each new FMEA counts against the monthly document allowance, whether you assembled it from a part family or from scratch. Writing requirements by hand, editing anything, and re-exporting are all free and unlimited.

Does topping up short requirements cost a draft?

Not the first time on any given process. Drafting now fills a short requirement in to three failure modes as part of writing it, so a process drafted from 31 August 2026 onward arrives at full depth for the one draft it already cost. Processes drafted before that did not get this, so the first Top up on each of them is free and still works when your drafts are used up — you should not pay twice to finish one draft. Any later top-up on the same process counts as one AI draft, and the button says which it is before you press it.

If I edit a process, what happens to the FMEAs using it?

They are updated automatically. The edit is pushed into every FMEA that uses that process as soon as it saves; you do not have to open them, and you never remove the process and add it back. Your recommended actions and the line number that operation has on each part are kept, since those belong to the document rather than to the shared process.

Can I edit what it generates?

Yes, every field and rating is fully editable, with autosave. Add, edit, or delete any row.

What does the export look like?

A real Excel .xlsx workbook (not a CSV or an XML file that triggers a warning), with merged cells grouping each process, requirement, and failure mode.

Is there a free way to try it?

Yes — a free, no-signup tool analyzes one process and shows the result on screen. That is the same unit of work the library is built from, so what you see is exactly what a finished process looks like. Create an account to keep processes in a library, edit them, and assemble them into FMEAs.

Need more help?

Email support@dropfeed.io and we'll get back to you.

← Back to Dropfeed